All Laws To Be Valid Must Follow Divine Law, These Laws Are Not Divine Laws

Divine Law And Legal Maxims

The so called laws are nothing more than corporate rules and this entire worlds system including the judicial system are complicit in upholding these crimes against us the people.The so called laws are nothing more than corporate rules and this entire worlds system including the judicial system are complicit in upholding these crimes against us the people.

These are not Divine Laws, the highest law. All laws to be valid must follow Divine law. The politicians create mandates and statutes which are only applicable to those who give their consent (of which registering to vote is)

Divine Law Definition:

The law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law.

Natural law –

Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law

Cognitive law

Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law

Positive law

Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law

Natural person –

Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law. A person is a corporation.

Lawful and Legal

What is legal is of “form”, what is lawful is of “substance” (Blacks Law 1st Edition).

That which is legal has been formed by man. A legal entity has been formed by man.

That which is lawful is of substance/essence and is a creation of God. A lawful man is of substance/essence.

Natural Person: Any human being who as such is a legal entity ….. (Amon v. Moreschi, 296 N.Y. 395, 73 N.E.2d 716.” Max Radin, Radin’s Law Dictionary (1955), p. 216).

What is legal is of “form”… therefore a “legal entity” is an entity of form.

Since “any human being who as such is a legal entity”, a human being is of form as well.

Human. Of the form and characteristics of man. (From Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition).

Form. The antithesis of substance; the appearance or superficial aspect rather than the substance or the essence. (Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition).

Natural Person = human being = legal entity

Legal entities are a conception of man; they are known in legalese as legal fictions.

The creation of a civil or legal person out of a thing, the investure of a chattel with toga civillis, may be an achievement of the imperial power, but it is beyond the compass of an American congress. Congress must first emancipate the slave, before it can endow him with the rights of a citizen under the constitution, or impose upon him the responsibilities of a legal person, or compel him to pay money, or part with liberty. United States v. Amy, 24 Fed.Cas.792, 794 #14,445 (1859).

The creation of a legal person also creates responsibilities and liabilities for this new legal person… responsibilities and liabilities due to a nation/country, which is also a legal entity.

Legal is defined as ”the “undoing of God’s law” (1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences and general literature / The R.S Peale 9th 1893).

James 4:12 There is one lawgiver, who can save and destroy: who art thou that judgest another.

Ecclesiastes 1:15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.

A fiction and a lie can never be a reality and a truth. That which is empty cannot be measured or counted.

A legal entity (human being) is of form, “the antithesis of substance” and therefore wanting (empty), and cannot be counted.

https://aetherical.blogspot.com/p/lawful-and-legal.html

Corporations can only contract with other corprations – Dead things can only deal with dead things. You are a flesh and blood living body living by grace of the Sovereign Lord Jesus Christ the true lawgiver. You have no contract with them.

Maxims of Law
Richard Anthony

“…………It is important to distinguish between commercial law and maxims of law, when quoting from their law. We should never, ever quote their codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, statutes, common law, merchant law, public policies, constitutions, etc., because these are commercial in nature, and if we use their commercial law, they can presume we are engaged in commerce (which means we are of the world), which will nullify our witness (because we are not of the world). Maxims of law are not commercial law, but are mostly based upon scripture and truth………”

There is only One Lawgiver

Richard Anthony

http://ecclesia.org/TRUTH/lawgiver.html

Knowing the difference between the words lawful and legal can one day free your mind and soul from the illusion of the Matrix. The word lawful is related to Natural Law (God’s Law). It is used to communicate things of substance. As for the word legal, it is related to laws created by man and is used to communicate things of form.

Read on –

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/news-articles-68.shtml#Legal

Legal is defined as”the “undoing of God’s law” (1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences and general literature / The R.S Peale 9th 1893).

James 4:12 “There is one lawgiver, who can save and destroy: who art thou that judgest another.”

Ecclesiastes 1:15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.”

A fiction and a lie can never be a reality and a truth. That which is empty cannot be measured or counted.

Divine Law Definition:

The law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law

One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!

As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4

Be careful hou you use your name on forms –

Flesh and blood living peoples have autographs. Corporations have signatures. Do not sign your name. Cross out signature and write autograph then write jo blogs never JOE BLOGS. Upper case signifies your corporate status.

majuscule Era: C.E.

Definition:

From 18th Century English as legal term meaning “a capital letter”. More commonly known as UPPER CASE. From Latin magnus = “large, great, important” and vulgar Latin culus = “anus, arse”. The meaning of the word literally translates as “great arse” indicating a general contempt by the authors of early LAW DICTIONARIES to those who do not recognise UPPER CASE legal fictions as having superiority over lower case names under ROMAN LAW.

Statutes are the en-act-ments of the Legislature that apply to publicly registered legal entities as franchises of the public State. Statutes offer limited “privileges and benefits” to “artificial persons” of various kinds, prescribing contract “rules and regulations” by consent. Statutes can have the appearance, or “colour of law”. Statutes govern legal entities as a franchise benefit to the public State.

Statutes are not Laws. The Law is from the People under God. Statutes are the law of the Sea ( the Pirates of finance) from the State.

The Queen at her coronation vowed to uphold the Christian faith.

The Queen has jurisdiction over the ‘Law of the land’ whatever that means.

Statutes are the ‘Law of the sea’, Bankers law over which the queen has no jurisdiction.

Common Law definition:

From 14th Century English usage following the formation of the Commons “the third estate of the English people as represented in Parliament” from 1377. Therefore, the popular (but incorrect) assumed meaning of Common Law as being “the LAW of the people”.

In a strict literal sense, the correct etymological meaning of common law is more accurately defined as “the laws to entrust, commit to a burden, public duty, service or obligation” — completely opposite to the popular misinterpretation of the phrase.

The main procedural foundations of Common Law since its inception remains the false Roman Law was VENETIAN LAW (more commonly known as MARITIME LAW and/or ADMIRALTY LAW) introduced in the 12th and early 13th Century during the creation of the highest legal PERSONALITY under Common Law–the HOLY SEE (Sea).

Hence, under the corrupted Roman Law of the ROMAN CULT living men and women are considered VESSELS subject to JURISDICTION of the SEE (Sea) with the WATERMARK of all nations with diplomatic recognition (CONCORDATS) of the SEE (Sea) set at the highest mountain peaks–hence all land is therefore “Under the Sea” and PROPERTY of the SEE (Sea).

Maxim of Law:

Quid fas non veritas est.

Legality is not Reality.

De jure sanguinis coronae

Definition:

Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against then to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition. This means any failure of DUE PROCESS or failure to account for RELIEF by the COURT obligates to compensate the individual accused.

Corporations –

ABN – Australian Business Numbers

This post is a listing of Australian Business / Company Numbers with their respective trading names.

NB/: A Private business has an ABN which in turn has NO authority of the Crown.

This list is updated periodically.

ABN’s – Australian Business Numbers

Brisbane City Council – ABN 72 002 765 795

Centrelink – ABN 29 468 422 437

Commonwealth of Australia – ABN 122 104 616

County Court of Victoria – ABN 32 790 288 959

Dept of Justice & Attorney General – ABN 13 846 673 994

Queensland Police Service – ABN 29 409 225 509

Queensland State Government – ABN 75 818 456 675

STATE OF VICTORIA – PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA – ABN 57 505 521 939

STATE OF VICTORIA – DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – ABN 32 790 228 959

The Department of the Attorney General – ABN 70 598 519 443

The State Government of Western Australia – ABN: 66 012 878 629

The State of New South Wales – ABN 066 561 153

The State of Queensland – ABN 066 102 930

The State of South Australia – ABN 050 208 921

The State of Tasmania – ABN 053 201 308

The State of Victoria – ABN 054 558 619

The State of Western Australia – ABN 072 526 008

Police:

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE – ABN 17 864 931 143

DEPT OF POLICE & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (TAS) – ABN: 19 173 586 474

NSW POLICE FORCE – ABN: 43 408 613 180

POLICE DEPARTMENT (VIC) / VICTORIA POLICE – ABN 63 446 481 493

QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE – ABN 29 409 225 509

SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE – ABN 93 799 021 552

WESTERN AUSTRALIA POLICE – ABN 91 724 684 688

The difference between what is Legal and what is Lawful is massive but we a led to believe they are one and the same when they are not. Lawful is common law the laws of the land and Legal are all the statutes and acts passed by parliament which needs your consent for the statutes and acts to be law on the person that consents. So the simple answer is DO NOT CONSENT, if you haven’t caused no …

I do not concur with a few statements made by this man as you will see, but overall it is a very informative read –

Lawfully Enter Rebellion

By steveadmin on Wednesday, May 16th, 2018

Breaking News The UK Government Is Bankrupt.

Here are a few basic questions which everyone should know the correct answers too.

    What is legal?

    What is Lawful?

    Are Legal and Lawful the same?

    What is common law?

What is LEGAL, the legal systems man made legislation, acts of parliament, statutes and rules (man made laws needing consent) coming from the UN because our sovereignty is treasonously being given away by the British government. It has been going on behind everyone’s backs for decades. There must be thousands and thousands of the man made laws which needs your consent to be governed in the first place. No Act or Statutes are above our UNALIENABLE RIGHTS.

……….. So the simple answer is DO NOT CONSENT, if you haven’t caused no one any harm or loss then there really is no crime being committed. The reason to use NO ONE is because those are the words used in Magna Charta 1215 Article 40 states To NO ONE will we sell, to NO ONE will we refuse or delay, right or justice…………..

See for yourself below is our unalienable rights…………….

http://steven-kirk.com/

On 24th August 1215 the Pope declared the Magna Carta null and void.

“…………Magna Carta – An Immediate Success…?

No. Not in the slightest.

Yes, King John agreed to the terms of Magna Carta, and yes, the barons renewed their oaths of allegiance to him. But the settlement did not last long. The security clause and the 25 barons of Magna Carta made it difficult for King John to wriggle out of the agreement as freely as he would have liked (for he had now given the royal seal of approval to a document that made him as susceptible to the law as any other ‘free man’), and he was much aggrieved by the manner in which Magna Carta had been enforced. And so he sought help from the Pope

Pope Innocent III

At the time, the pope was the official overlord of the kingdoms of England and Ireland. King John sent messengers to the Pope requesting that Magna Carta be annulled. In response, the barons did not give up the city of London, and vowed not to do so until the terms of the charter were implemented.

Pope Innocent III saw the Magna Carta from the king’s perspective, however, and was indeed very alarmed by the charter’s terms. On 24th August 1215 the pope issued the papal bull, a document in which he describes Magna Carta as “illegal, unjust, harmful to royal rights and shameful to the English people”. The papal bull declared Magna Carta “null and void of all validity for ever”………………..”

http://www.magnacartatranslation.com/about-us/magna-carta/

By the terms of the “FOREVER” Treaty of 1213, the Vatican has since owned the Crown which it has rented to the British Monarchy per the terms of said Treaty, to wit:

http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/123/211-the-secret-